<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Manufacturer China &#187; China Stock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.manufacturerchina.net/category/china-stock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.manufacturerchina.net</link>
	<description>China Manufacturer, China Supplier, China Wholesale News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:10:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Reported Facebook/Baidu Deal Puts Pressure on Sina</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/reported-facebookbaidu-deal-puts-pressure-on-sina/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/reported-facebookbaidu-deal-puts-pressure-on-sina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China Stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manufacturerchina.net/reported-facebookbaidu-deal-puts-pressure-on-sina/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trader Mark submits:
Sina.com (SINA) is showing the first weakness in a while, on reports Facebook is entering China via a partnership with Baidu (BIDU).    That said, after the initial (over)reaction which shaved about 7 points  off the name, the stock has bounced back well in the afternoon.
(Click to enlarge)
The hit to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://fundmymutualfund.com/">Trader Mark</a> submits:</strong>
<div><b>Sina.com (<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sina" title="Sina Corp.">SINA</a>)</b> is showing the first weakness in a while, on reports Facebook is entering China via a partnership with<b> Baidu (<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bidu" title="Baidu.com, Inc.">BIDU</a>)</b>.    That said, after the initial (over)reaction which shaved about 7 points  off the name, the stock has bounced back well in the afternoon.
<div><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/4/11/saupload_sina.png" /><br/><em>(Click to enlarge)</em>
<p>The hit to Sina seems wrong for a few reasons &#8211; first there are already a  handful of very significant social networking sites in China, 2 of  which are expected to go public in the U.S. this year &#8211; and whose IPOs I  expect to rocket.  (in fact, the first &#8230; Kaixin001.com has <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704415104576250220436991058.html" rel="nofollow">already secured the investment bankers</a>)   Second, Sina&#8217;s platform is a peer of Twitter, not Facebook.  That said,  Baidu is a powerhouse in the country (in search) so this means more  competition for everyone in the &#8217;social communication&#8217; space.  Baidu&#8217;s  stock is reacting favorably to the news, although off highs</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><br/><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/262977-reported-facebook-baidu-deal-puts-pressure-on-sina?source=feed">Complete Story &raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/reported-facebookbaidu-deal-puts-pressure-on-sina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCME: Accusations About Inability of Deloitte as Auditor Debunked, SEC Filings Correct</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/ccme-accusations-about-inability-of-deloitte-as-auditor-debunked-sec-filings-correct/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/ccme-accusations-about-inability-of-deloitte-as-auditor-debunked-sec-filings-correct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China Stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manufacturerchina.net/ccme-accusations-about-inability-of-deloitte-as-auditor-debunked-sec-filings-correct/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jae Jun submits: 
I understand that shorts have to exist in the market to balance the equation, and let me first say that after having read “The Art of Short Selling”  thoroughly a couple of times, I have the utmost respect for fundamental  short sellers such as Kathryn Staley, Jim Chanos and David [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/">Jae Jun</a> submits: </strong>
<p>I understand that shorts have to exist in the market to balance the equation, and let me first say that after having read “<em><a href="http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/book-reviews/book-review-the-art-of-short-selling/?source=rss" rel="nofollow">The Art of Short Selling</a></em>”  thoroughly a couple of times, I have the utmost respect for fundamental  short sellers such as Kathryn Staley, Jim Chanos and David Einhorn.</p>
<p>China MediaExpress (<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ccme" title="China MediaExpress Holdings, Inc.">CCME</a>) is a Chinese company that I currently hold  and is currently under heavy scrutiny as a fraud. Reports by boutiques  specializing on shorts have been released, and while I must give credit  to Muddy Waters for the work they have put in to their report, the main  argument of the shorter’s report is that the numbers are “too good to be  true”.</p>
<p>But I’m going to present a case for at least why the SEC filings are accurate.</p>
<h4>Independent Auditor Required</h4>
<p>The role of an independent auditor is crucial in protecting investors  from dishonest management and</p>
<p><br/><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/262403-ccme-accusations-about-inability-of-deloitte-as-auditor-debunked-sec-filings-correct?source=feed">Complete Story &raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/ccme-accusations-about-inability-of-deloitte-as-auditor-debunked-sec-filings-correct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the West Was Lost: China Drinks U.S. Economy&#8217;s Milkshake</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/how-the-west-was-lost-china-drinks-u-s-economys-milkshake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/how-the-west-was-lost-china-drinks-u-s-economys-milkshake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China Stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manufacturerchina.net/how-the-west-was-lost-china-drinks-u-s-economys-milkshake/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin McElroy submits: 

  While the leadership in the United States quibbles       about whether we’re at war in Libya or we’re not (hint: We are), or       whether we should reduce our deficit by 0.23% or not (that’s the $33    [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.wyattresearch.com/">Kevin McElroy</a> submits: </strong>
<p>
  <span>While the leadership in the United States quibbles       about whether we’re at war in Libya or we’re not (hint: We are), or       whether we should reduce our deficit by 0.23% or not (that’s the $33       billion Congress is currently debating), the developing world continues       to care less and less.</span>
</p>
<p><span>Take a look at the charts below, which I gleefully       borrowed from a</span> <a href="http://pragcap.com/the-boj-answers-the-trillion-dollar-question-what-is-causing-the-commodity-rally" rel="nofollow">       <span>recent Bank of Japan report on       commodities</span></a><span>:</span></p>
<p>
  <span>[Click all to enlarge]</span>
</p>
<p>
  <span><br />
    <a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2011/4/7/saupload_rp_204.6.11_201.png" rel="lightbox" /><br />
    <br/><br />
  </span>
</p>
<p><span>We’re well past the point of being equal partners       in the usage of the world’s energy resources. If the chart on the left is       any indication, we’re actually well on our way to becoming rather       inconsequential as a global energy consumer.</span> <span>And it’s pretty clear       that any growth in developing world energy consumption means a       commensurate decrease in energy consumption on a percentage basis. </span></p>
<p>
  <span><span>But       what might not be so clear from the chart on the right:</span></span></p>
<p><br/><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/262420-how-the-west-was-lost-china-drinks-u-s-economy-s-milkshake?source=feed">Complete Story &raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/how-the-west-was-lost-china-drinks-u-s-economys-milkshake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Variant View Research Responds to Advanced Battery Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/variant-view-research-responds-to-advanced-battery-technologies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/variant-view-research-responds-to-advanced-battery-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China Stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manufacturerchina.net/variant-view-research-responds-to-advanced-battery-technologies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Variant View Research submits:
On 4/6/2011, Advanced Battery Technologies (ABAT) issued a press release responding to our research report titled &#8220;Advanced Battery Technologies (ABAT): The Most Egregious Chinese RTO.&#8221;
We present, side-by-side, excerpts from ABAT&#8217;s response and statements from their official filings. ABAT&#8217;s response contains numerous false and misleading statements which directly contradict its filings. We have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://variantviewresearch.com/">Variant View Research</a> submits:</strong>
<p>On 4/6/2011, Advanced Battery Technologies (<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/abat" title="Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc.">ABAT</a>) issued a <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Advanced-Battery-Technologies-pz-851651760.html?x=0&amp;.v=1" rel="nofollow">press release</a> responding to our research report titled &#8220;<a href="http://variantviewresearch.com/?p=141" rel="nofollow">Advanced Battery Technologies (<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/abat" title="Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc.">ABAT</a>): The Most Egregious Chinese RTO</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>We present, side-by-side, excerpts from ABAT&#8217;s response and statements from their official filings. ABAT&#8217;s response contains numerous false and misleading statements which directly contradict its filings. We have provided links to these filings to make it convenient for the reader to verify our claims.</p>
<p>
  <b>In our report, we noted that Chairman Fu now owns the company&#8217;s key subsidiary, which ABAT had previously claimed ownership of.</b>
</p>
<p>
  <i>We wrote:</i>
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If the filings are accurate, the Chairman transferred ownership of the company&#8217;s sole operating subsidiary to himself without explanation or compensation. If the filings are inaccurate, then the company is guilty of misrepresenting itself as previously owning 100% of HLJ ZQPT.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
  <i>Excerpt from ABAT response on 4/6/2011:</i>
</p>
<blockquote>
<p><b><em>[HLJ ZQPT] has been owned by 16 investors, including Chairman Fu,</em></b></p>
</blockquote>
<p><br/><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/262352-variant-view-research-responds-to-advanced-battery-technologies?source=feed">Complete Story &raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/variant-view-research-responds-to-advanced-battery-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China&#8217;s Banking Sector Strength Is Overstated</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/chinas-banking-sector-strength-is-overstated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/chinas-banking-sector-strength-is-overstated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China Stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manufacturerchina.net/chinas-banking-sector-strength-is-overstated/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alicia Damley submits:

  The growth potential for China’s financial sector is undisputed, driven by strong growth and an under-penetrated, large population rapidly accumulating wealth (see here). In anticipation of this, investor valuation of Chinese banks put them into the top group of global banks by market capitalization. Critical to the development of its economy, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/author/alicia-damley">Alicia Damley</a> submits:</strong>
<p>
  <span>The growth potential for China’s financial sector is undisputed, driven by strong growth and an under-penetrated, large population rapidly accumulating wealth (see <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/214176-improving-investment-opportunities-in-china-s-banking-sector">here</a>). In anticipation of this, investor valuation of Chinese banks put them into the top group of global banks by market capitalization. Critical to the development of its economy, China’s domestic financial sector has been nurtured cautiously, shielded from foreign competition and remains under significant regulatory oversight. For example, in banking, lending growth is targeted, lending rates must exceed a floor, deposit rates cannot exceed a ceiling, and all deposits and foreign currency must be transmitted via the banking system. However, this has not prevented a circumvention of letter and spirit of the rules.</span>
</p>
<p>
  <span> </span><br />
  <span>A recent example of this</span></p>
<p><br/><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/262472-china-s-banking-sector-strength-is-overstated?source=feed">Complete Story &raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/chinas-banking-sector-strength-is-overstated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Should Take New Look at Old Export Controls</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/u-s-should-take-new-look-at-old-export-controls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/u-s-should-take-new-look-at-old-export-controls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China Stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manufacturerchina.net/u-s-should-take-new-look-at-old-export-controls/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick Chovanec submits:
One sure sign of a rising China is its more assertive stance in  bilateral talks with the US. So last year, when US negotiators proposed  that China help reduce the bilateral trade imbalance by opening up its  markets to US exports, Beijing was ready with a proposal of its own: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://chovanec.wordpress.com/">Patrick Chovanec</a> submits:</strong>
<p>One sure sign of a rising China is its more assertive stance in  bilateral talks with the US. So last year, when US negotiators proposed  that China help reduce the bilateral trade imbalance by opening up its  markets to US exports, Beijing was ready with a proposal of its own:  We’ll buy more American goods, if you scrap restrictions on high-tech  exports.  The US Cold War-style mentality, they argued, is the main  thing standing in the way of more balanced trade.</p>
<p>Most experts consider the Chinese argument to be overblown. They  estimate the annual amount of sales to China blocked by US export  controls at US$2-3 billion. (The only hard number comes from a 2009  survey by the American Chambers of Commerce based in Beijing and  Shanghai, which tallied US$560 million in actual lost sales). This  barely puts a dent in China’s $252 billion trade gap with the US for</p>
<p><br/><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/262611-u-s-should-take-new-look-at-old-export-controls?source=feed">Complete Story &raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/u-s-should-take-new-look-at-old-export-controls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Play on the Hang Seng China AH Premium Index, Which Is Poised for a Rebound</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/a-play-on-the-hang-seng-china-ah-premium-index-which-is-poised-for-a-rebound/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/a-play-on-the-hang-seng-china-ah-premium-index-which-is-poised-for-a-rebound/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China Stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manufacturerchina.net/a-play-on-the-hang-seng-china-ah-premium-index-which-is-poised-for-a-rebound/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China Play Stocks submits:
China A-shares are traded in Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges, and not available directly to foreign individual investors. China H-shares trade in Hong Kong and are open to foreign investors. The A-shares have historically traded at significant premiums to H-shares. This is because a bulk of the A-shares investors have been individual mainland [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://chinaplaystocks.com/">China Play Stocks</a> submits:</strong></p>
<p>China A-shares are traded in Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges, and not available directly to foreign individual investors. China H-shares trade in Hong Kong and are open to foreign investors. The A-shares have historically traded at significant premiums to H-shares. This is because a bulk of the A-shares investors have been individual mainland retail investors who don&#8217;t have many other avenues to invest their savings; remember, their savings rate is estimated to range from 35% to 50%. These Chinese retail investors are of a speculative bent and tend to chase performance, resulting in wild swings like the bubble of 2007. Mainland retail investors were limited in their ability to invest in H-shares till the recent introduction of the Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor &#40;QDII&#41; scheme. Short-selling was not permitted in the mainland until recently, so there was no way to arbitrage by shorting the A-shares and going long the equivalent H-shares.</p>
<p>The</p>
<p><br/><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/262703-a-play-on-the-hang-seng-china-ah-premium-index-which-is-poised-for-a-rebound?source=feed">Complete Story &raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/a-play-on-the-hang-seng-china-ah-premium-index-which-is-poised-for-a-rebound/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Puda Coal Chairman Sells Half the Company; Pledges the Other Half to Chinese PE Investors</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/puda-coal-chairman-sells-half-the-company-pledges-the-other-half-to-chinese-pe-investors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/puda-coal-chairman-sells-half-the-company-pledges-the-other-half-to-chinese-pe-investors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China Stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manufacturerchina.net/puda-coal-chairman-sells-half-the-company-pledges-the-other-half-to-chinese-pe-investors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alfred Little submits:
Chinese RTO Puda Coal, Inc (PUDA) Chairman Ming Zhao transferred the ownership of PUDA’s sole Chinese operating entity, Shanxi Puda Coal Group Co., Ltd (“Shanxi Coal”), to himself in 2009 without shareholder approval according to official government filings.  Then, in 2010, Zhao sold 49% and pledged the other 51% of Shanxi Coal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://labemp.wordpress.com/">Alfred Little</a> submits:</strong>
<p>Chinese RTO Puda Coal, Inc (<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/puda" title="Puda Coal Inc.">PUDA</a>) Chairman Ming Zhao transferred the ownership of PUDA’s sole Chinese operating entity, Shanxi Puda Coal Group Co., Ltd (“Shanxi Coal”), to himself in 2009 without shareholder approval according to official government filings.<span>  </span>Then, in 2010, Zhao sold 49% and pledged the other 51% of Shanxi Coal to CITIC Trust Co., Ltd (“CITIC”), a Chinese private equity fund, for RMB245 million ($37.1 million).<span>  </span></p>
<p>
  <span>Zhao then recklessly leveraged Shanxi Coal by borrowing RMB3.5 billion ($530.3 million) from CITIC at an incredibly high 14.5% annual interest rate (including fees) to finance the development of its coal mines.<span>  </span>PUDA shareholders are completely unaware of these transactions that decimate the value of its U.S. listed shares.<span>  </span></span>
</p>
<p>
  <b>Background – An Industry Facing Government Mandated Consolidation</b>
</p>
<p>According to PUDA’s 2010 <a href="http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHtmlSection1?SectionID=7802381-16881-68060&amp;SessionID=hmZFHFiYvetBjP7" rel="nofollow">10-K</a> filing:</p>
<blockquote><p><span>In order to improve production efficiency, workplace safety and to reduce coal mine accidents, the Shanxi provincial government issued</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><br/><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/262779-puda-coal-chairman-sells-half-the-company-pledges-the-other-half-to-chinese-pe-investors?source=feed">Complete Story &raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/puda-coal-chairman-sells-half-the-company-pledges-the-other-half-to-chinese-pe-investors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Latest Chinese Short Targets: Duoyuan Global Water and Puda Coal</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/the-latest-chinese-short-targets-duoyuan-global-water-and-puda-coal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/the-latest-chinese-short-targets-duoyuan-global-water-and-puda-coal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China Stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manufacturerchina.net/the-latest-chinese-short-targets-duoyuan-global-water-and-puda-coal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Finance submits: 
Recently, Chinese small cap stocks have been assaulted from all sides with allegations of fraudulent and deceitful business practices.  Rino International (RINO) was the first guilty party, but some attributed that to simple statistics; there are frauds in the United States as well.
More recently, China MediaExpress (CCME) came under scrutiny and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://newfinance.tumblr.com/">New Finance</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Recently, Chinese small cap stocks have been assaulted from all sides with allegations of fraudulent and deceitful business practices.  Rino International (<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rino" title="RINO International Corp.">RINO</a>) was the first guilty party, but some attributed that to simple statistics; there are frauds in the United States as well.</p>
<p>More recently, China MediaExpress (<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ccme" title="China MediaExpress Holdings, Inc.">CCME</a>) came under scrutiny and despite a Big 4 auditor and investments from large market players, it seems the company will also be revealed as a sham.  These two combined have shown that even Big 4 audits, investment from marquee firms and “legitimate” on the ground research can’t uncover fraud in every case.  This week, two players of the Chinese short game have released independent reports on two different stocks.  The latest targets are Duoyuan Global Water and Puda Coal.</p>
<p>
  <strong>Duoyuan Global Water (<a href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dgw" title="Duoyuan Global Water">DGW</a>)</strong>
</p>
<p><br/> Duoyuan was trading at $6.03 as recently as a week ago, but a report from infamous short Muddy Waters</p>
<p><br/><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/262822-the-latest-chinese-short-targets-duoyuan-global-water-and-puda-coal?source=feed">Complete Story &raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/the-latest-chinese-short-targets-duoyuan-global-water-and-puda-coal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global PMI: Growth Still Strong but Moderating</title>
		<link>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/global-pmi-growth-still-strong-but-moderating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/global-pmi-growth-still-strong-but-moderating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China Stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manufacturerchina.net/global-pmi-growth-still-strong-but-moderating/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Prieur du Plessis submits: 
The  manufacturing PMIs for March indicate that the pace of the robust  global manufacturing sector has moderated. My GDP-weighted PMI for the  major economies fell to 56.0 from 58.2 in February.
The  pace of expansion in the U.S. eased slightly to a still robust 61.2 in  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/prieurdp.jpg" title="prieur du plessis" alt="prieur du plessis" align="left" hspace="6" vspace="6" width="75" height="89" border="1" /> <strong><a href="http://www.investmentpostcards.com">Prieur du Plessis</a> submits: </strong>
<p>The  manufacturing PMIs for March indicate that the pace of the robust  global manufacturing sector has moderated. My GDP-weighted PMI for the  major economies fell to 56.0 from 58.2 in February.</p>
<p>The  pace of expansion in the U.S. eased slightly to a still robust 61.2 in  March from 61.4 in February. The pace in the Eurozone also eased to 57.5  from 59.0 in February and easing was widespread. Greece, on the other  hand, has seen a moderation of the contraction in its manufacturing  sector. The U.K.’s manufacturing sector moderated relatively sharply from a  robust 61.5 to 57.1.</p>
<p>As expected,  the expansion in Japan’s manufacturing sector was halted as the impact  of the terrible disaster is being felt. After registering its second  consecutive month of expansion in February, the manufacturing PMI  dropped from 52.9 to 46.4. The huge turnaround in Australia’s  manufacturing sector in February came to an abrupt end in</p>
<p><br/><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/262819-global-pmi-growth-still-strong-but-moderating?source=feed">Complete Story &raquo;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.manufacturerchina.net/global-pmi-growth-still-strong-but-moderating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

